keydr/docs/BUILDING.md

Building keydr

TL;DR

cargo build
cargo test
cargo build --release

Plain cargo. No wrapper, no memory ceiling, no reduced optimisation. A clean release build peaks at 1.92 GB and takes 2m17s on a 4-core / 7.6 GB VM.

If that's not what you're seeing, read on.

---

The build used to be unusable — here's what was actually wrong

Release builds consumed 5+ GB and never finished; the VM thrashed so badly that SSH stopped responding and needed a console reboot.

The obvious explanations were all wrong:

• Not too many parallel jobs. The peak came from a single rustc process. A single process's memory is unaffected by --jobs.
• Not insufficient RAM. 8 GB is fine for a project this size.
• Not LTO (though LTO made it worse).

The cause was a codegen bug in rust-i18n v3. Its macro emitted one HashMap::from([...]) construction and one add_translations() call per translation string — all inside a single function body. With 21 locales and ~9,000 keys that's 8,652 separate HashMap constructions in one function. LLVM's optimiser scales superlinearly on function size, so it consumed ~4.5 GB trying to optimise that one initialiser.

Verified by expanding the macro:

	rust-i18n v3.1.5	rust-i18n v4.2.1
HashMap::from constructions	8,652	0
add_translations calls	8,652	21 (one per locale)
Expanded lines (lib target)	93,026	73,444

Upstream fixed this in v4.0.0. Reproduce the check yourself:

cargo install cargo-expand
cargo expand --lib | grep -c 'HashMap::from'

The fix

cargo add rust-i18n@4

That's it. Measured on this box, same machine, clean builds:

Configuration	Peak	Time
v3, opt-level=3, thin LTO	5.2 GB	stalled >18 min, never finished
v3, opt-level=3, no LTO	4.5 GB	stalled >12 min, never finished
v3, opt-level=1, no LTO (workaround)	1.8 GB	15m30s
v4, opt-level=3, thin LTO	2.08 GB	3m25s
v4, stock cargo defaults	1.92 GB	2m17s

The earlier workaround — dropping opt-level to 1 and disabling LTO — has been removed. It was treating a symptom.

---

What's still in .cargo/config.toml, and why

Nothing there reduces the optimisation of shipped code.

• jobs = 3 — uses 3 of 4 cores so the box stays interactive while compiling. Purely about responsiveness; delete it if you don't care.
• lld linker — ships with the Rust toolchain, no install needed. GNU ld is single-threaded and holds the whole link graph in memory.
• debug = 1 for this crate, debug = 0 for dependencies (dev/test profiles only). Debug info is the largest contributor to target/ size and link time. Level 1 keeps line numbers, so backtraces still work.

[profile.release] is deliberately absent — cargo's defaults are right.

---

Known remaining inefficiency

src/main.rs re-declares the whole module tree (mod app; mod config; ...) instead of depending on the keydr lib target, so every module compiles twice — once for the lib, once for the bin. The i18n! macro must therefore be invoked in both crate roots (t!() expands to crate::_rust_i18n_t, so it must exist in each crate).

With v4 this duplication is cheap (21 calls, not 8,652), so it's no longer worth fixing for build performance alone. If you ever restructure main.rs to use keydr::..., build time would roughly halve again.

---

If a build ever does go wild again

The machine-level protections below need no per-project changes.

Keep SSH alive (recommended, needs root once)

# Reserve memory for the SSH daemon so it can't be swapped out entirely.
sudo systemctl edit ssh        # [Service] / MemoryMin=128M

Do not bother with systemd-oomd on this box — it is a separate package whose only reverse-dependencies are ubuntu-desktop*, so Ubuntu Server never installs it (systemctl is-enabled systemd-oomd → not-found here). Use earlyoom instead, which is in universe and kills only the single highest-scoring process rather than a whole cgroup:

sudo apt install earlyoom
# /etc/default/earlyoom
EARLYOOM_ARGS="-m 8 -s 5 -r 60 \
  --avoid '(^|/)(systemd|sshd|mosh-server|tmux.*|bash|fish)$' \
  --prefer '(^|/)(rustc|cargo|ld|lld|collect2)$'"

--avoid protects your shell; --prefer points it at the compiler. Fedora enabled earlyoom by default for exactly this "system becomes completely unresponsive, user has no choice but to force power off" scenario.

Cap every build at once, forever (needs root once)

This is the global knob — no wrapper script, no per-project config:

sudo systemctl set-property user-1000.slice MemoryHigh=5G MemoryMax=6500M

Applies to every shell and every build you start, persists across reboots. Because sshd itself lives in system.slice, capping the user slice can never lock you out of a new login. (Ubuntu already ships TasksMax=33% this way via /usr/lib/systemd/system/user-.slice.d/, so it's a distro-blessed pattern.)

Note MemoryHigh at the slice level is reasonable — it throttles a sprawling session gradually. Do not put it on a single short-lived build scope, where it causes the reclaim-stall described below.

Cap one build ad-hoc (no root)

memory is delegated to the user slice on this box, so you can confine a single command without any wrapper script:

systemd-run --user --scope -p MemoryMax=4G -p MemorySwapMax=0 \
    cargo build --release

MemorySwapMax=0 is the important half. The lockup was never really an OOM — it was thrashing. With swap available the kernel pages sshd out to feed the build and the box goes catatonic while oom_kill stays at 0. Denying the build swap turns a slow total failure into a fast contained one.

Do not add MemoryHigh to a single build scope. It sounds safer but traps the process in continuous reclaim so it grinds forever instead of dying. Measured against an identical 256 MB ceiling: MemoryMax alone → clean kill in seconds; MemoryMax + MemoryHigh → still spinning after 45 seconds.

Diagnosing which crate is expensive

cargo build --release --timings      # HTML report in target/cargo-timings/
cargo install cargo-llvm-lines
cargo llvm-lines --release | head -30 # which functions generate the most IR
cargo expand --lib | wc -l            # how much code a macro really emits

cargo llvm-lines and cargo expand are what actually found this bug. Reach for them before touching opt-level.

Upstream context

Cargo has no memory-aware job scheduling; it schedules on core count only. That's a known gap (rust-lang/cargo#12912), and maintainers have said they'd rather delegate resource limits to the OS (cgroups) than build it into cargo. So the systemd approach above isn't a hack — it's the sanctioned answer. But in this case none of it was needed: the real fix was a dependency upgrade.